LET’S CHANGE THE CONVERSATION BY

UNDERSTANDING LIMITATIONS

Injectable insulin is effective—but complexities limit its use6

img
PHYSIOLOGIC CONTROL

Currently, there is a lack of insulin
therapies that match the time action profile of physiologic insulin11

img
TREATMENT COMPLEXITIES

Challenges of coordinating timing of mealtime injections and injection burden all limit traditional insulin use6,11

img
DELAYED INITIATION

The initiation of traditional insulin therapy is often delayed in patients with type 2 diabetes12

img
POOR COMPLIANCE

As many as 1 in 5 mealtime injections
are intentionally missed6

LET’S CHANGE THE CONVERSATION WITH

A UNIQUE PROFILE

Afrezza® has a time action profile that mimics physiologic insulin13

PHYSIOLOGIC POSTPRANDIAL INSULIN PROFILE5

img

Adapted from: Boli GB, etal. N Engl J Med.1984;310:1706-1711. Ciofetta M, et al. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:795-800.

LET’S CHANGE THE CONVERSATION WITH

A UNIQUE PROFILE

Afrezza® has a time action profile that mimics physiologic insulin13

AFREZZA POSTPRANDIAL INSULIN PROFILE1

img
img

Data from a randomized, controlled, six-treatment, crossover
dose-response study compared Afrezza with the rapid-acting insulin analog, lispro, in 30 patients with type 1 diabetes. Mean insulin effect (baseline-corrected glucose infusion rate) profile shown after administration of 4 and 12 Afrezza unit doses in patients with type 1 diabetes. On average, the pharmacodynamic effect of Afrezza, measured as area under the glucose infusion rate—time curve (AUC GIR)—increased linearly with doses up to 48 units. Intrapatient variability in AUC GIR and GIRmax is approximately 28% (95% CI 21-42%) and 27% (95% CI 20-40%), respectively.1

LET’S CHANGE THE CONVERSATION BY

CONSIDERING THE PATIENT

Afrezza® mealtime control should be considered in the context of weight change1,7,8

WEIGHT PROFILE IN 2 PIVOTAL TRIALS1,7,8

img

img Study design: (type 1):Open-label
non-inferiority trial comparing the change in A1C baseline to week 24 of prandial Afrezza with SC rapid-acting insulin, both with basal insulin in adult patients with type 1 diabetes and an A1C >7.5%.


Patients on Afrezza lost weight (-0.4 kg) compared with weight gain (+0.9) for patients on SC rapid-acting insulin (P=0.0102). Afrezza and basal insulin was therefore considered non-inferior to SC rapid-acting and basal insulin in terms of less weight gain.7

Study design (type 2):Double-blind placebo-controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes with an A1C ≥7.5% on metformin alone or 2 or more oral agents (OAs) randomized to receive prandial Afrezza (n=133) or prandial inhaled placebo (n=176).

Over the 24-week treatment period, there was an average weight increase of 0.49 kg in the Afrezza group compared with a weight loss of 1.1 kg in the placebo group.8

LET’S TALK ABOUT

THE SAFETY PROFILE

Afrezza® has been studied in over 3,000 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes1

INCIDENCE OF COUGH IN POOLED SAFETY POPULATION1,9

img
A CLOSER LOOK AT COUGH
  • 94% of cough episodes were characterized
    as intermittent or single defined episodes9
  • Cough was generally mild, dry, occurred within 10 minutes of inhalation, was transient and declined with continued use9

LET’S TALK ABOUT

ACCESS + SUPPORT

MannKind is committed to helping patients access Afrezza®

img

Pay as little as $15 per
Afrezza prescription.*

Afrezza Savings Card

Patients with commercial insurance may pay as
little as $15 for each prescription, even if insurance denies or requires a prior authorization.

ADDITIONAL OPTIONS FOR
ALL OF YOUR PATIENTS

Additional programs and services may
be available for your patients who are
not eligible for the Savings Card.

For details, call the MannKind Customer
Experience Center at(833) 623-4843or emailguide@mannkindcorp.com

LET’S CHANGE THE CONVERSATION BY

GETTING STARTED

Improved mealtime control starts with gaining meaningful experience with Afrezza®
in your practice

img
START WITH 5 PATIENTS

Identify 5 type 1 or 2 patients who would
benefit from improved mealtime control

img
PRESCRIBE AFREZZA

Select the right dosing option
for each patient

img
SEE IMPROVED MEALTIME CONTROL

See the impact Afrezza may have on your
patients' glycemic control at their next visit

img

IT’S TIME TO CHANGE THE CONVERSATION AROUND

MEALTIME CONTROL

Give your patients improved mealtime control with Afrezza®1,2

FAST IN, FAST OUT1,4

Time to first measurable effect is ~ 12 minutes.
In the blood in <1 minute.

Peak effect in 35-45 minutes.*

Out within 1.5-3 hours.*

MANAGEMENT IN THE MOMENT1

Inhale when food arrives.

Option to take more if needed.

Mealtime flexibility.

CONSIDER THE PATIENT1,7,8

No mealtime needlesticks required.

Up to 1,000 fewer injections per year.

Weight-neutral profile.

PROVEN MEALTIME CONTROL1

Over 3,000 patients studied.

Both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

*Based on 4-12 unit dosing, respectively. On average, the pharmacodynamic effect of Afrezza, measured as area under the glucose infusion rate—time curve (AUC GIR)—increased
linearly with doses up to 48 units.1

Based on an estimation of approximately 3 meals per day, for a total of 1,095 possible mealtime injections per year.

IT’S TIME TO CHANGE THE CONVERSATION AROUND

MEALTIME CONTROL

Thank you for your participation!

We hope you found this Interactive Learning Module on mealtime control informative and engaging.

Request a Rep+Educational Materials
img
REFERENCES
  • Afrezza (insulin human) Inhalation Powder Prescribing Information. MannKind Corporation.
  • Akturk HK, Snell-Bergeon JK, Rewers A, et al. Improved postprandial glucose with inhaled Technosphere insulin compared with insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes on multiple daily injections: the STAT study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018;20(10):639–647.
  • Lasalle JR, Berria R. Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a practical approach for primary care physicians and other health care professionals. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013;113(3):152–162.
  • Rave K, Heise T, Heinemann L, et al. Inhaled Technosphere insulin in comparison to subcutaneous regular human insulin: time action profile and variability in subjects with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(2):205–212.
  • Rossetti P, Porcellati F. Prevention of hypoglycemia while achieving good glycemic control in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(2):S113–S120.
  • Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Kruger DF, et al. Correlates of insulin injection omission. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(2):240–245.
  • Bode BW, McGill JB, Lorber DL, et al. Inhaled Technosphere insulin compared with injected prandial insulin in type 1 diabetes: a randomized 24-week trial. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(12):2266–2273.
  • Rosenstock J, Franco D, Korpachev V, et al. Inhaled Technosphere insulin versus inhaled Technosphere placebo in insulin-naive subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetes agent. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(12):2274–2281.
  • Data on file. MannKind Corporation.
  • Rosenstock J, Lorber DL, Gnudi L, et al. Prandial inhaled insulin plus basal insulin glargine versus twice daily biaspart insulin for type 2 diabetes: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9733):2244–2253.
  • Riddle MC. Basal glucose can be controlled, but the prandial problem persists–it’s the next target! Diabetes Care. 2017;40(3):291-300.
  • Khunti K, Wolden ML, Thorsted BL, Andersen M, Davies MJ. Clinical inertia in people with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of more than 80,000 people. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(11)3411-3417.
  • Boss AH, Petrucci R, Lorber D. Coverage of prandial insulin requirements by means of an ultra-rapid-acting inhaled insulin. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(4):773-779.
img
TYPE2

Would you like to review

jason’s patient profile?

img
img
TYPE1

Would you like to review

SARAH’s patient profile?

img